EFF and ARTICLE 19 Submission to the European Commission on the DSA Trusted Flagger Guidelines

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and ARTICLE 19 have jointly submitted comments to the European Commission regarding the draft guidelines for the Digital Services Act’s (DSA) trusted flagger mechanism. The submission aims to ensure the guidelines align with the DSA’s core objectives of protecting freedom of expression while maintaining intermediary liability protections and avoiding general monitoring obligations.
The DSA’s trusted flagger system is designed to help online platforms identify and address illegal content more efficiently. However, concerns have been raised that poorly implemented guidelines could lead to excessive removal of lawful speech, undermine due process, and grant disproportionate influence to government authorities over online expression. The EFF and ARTICLE 19 emphasize the need for clear safeguards to preserve these fundamental rights.
The organizations support the Commission’s approach of focusing on good practices and illustrative examples rather than legal interpretations that might steer platforms toward specific enforcement outcomes. They argue that the guidelines should include stronger protections for freedom of expression, due process, and the impartiality of trusted flaggers.
A key concern addressed in the submission is the definition of "illegal content." The DSA itself does not prescribe a definition; instead, it relies on applicable national or EU law. The submission clarifies that trusted flaggers submit prioritized notices, but platforms remain responsible for determining whether content is actually illegal. Platforms must conduct thorough assessments and avoid automatically removing content based solely on a trusted flagger notice.
The EFF and ARTICLE 19’s submission outlines several areas where the guidelines could be strengthened to better safeguard users’ rights. The full submission is available for review on the EFF’s website.
#DigitalServicesAct #TrustedFlagger #EFF #ARTICLE19 #OnlineSpeech #EUCommission #DigitalRights
Comments (0)
No comments yet — be the first to weigh in.
Related Coverage
Technology
European Court: Apple Can Not Shirk Off its Interoperability Requirements
The General Court of the European Union has ruled against Apple in its legal challenges to the European Commission’s Digital Markets Act (DMA), affirming the co...
Technology
🚫 Don't Let Congress Age-Gate the Internet | EFFector 38.13
The U.S. Congress is advancing legislation critics warn could fundamentally alter online expression and privacy under the guise of child protection. The recentl...
Technology
Most Smart Watches, Rings, and Bands Lack Basic Transparency Reports and Key Privacy Features
Wearable health devices like smartwatches, fitness rings, and activity bands are becoming increasingly popular in the United States, with about 40 percent of Am...
Technology
California Steps Back From Dangerous Expansion of its Age-Gating Law
The California Legislature has scaled back a controversial expansion of the state’s age-gating law, removing provisions that critics warned would further threat...
Most Read
Why Land Restoration is Key to Climate Resilience and Food Security
Trump and Putin's Escalating Wars Threaten Global Stability Six Months In
Manchester City Fullback Nico O'Reilly Wins 2026 PFA Young Player of the Year